2.0 You Can (Not) Progress

By Google definition the act of “revisionism” means: “The theory or practice of revising one's attitude to a previously accepted situation or point of view.” This theory was conceptualized around 1950 and may be often associated with Marxist and political theory.

This attitude is detrimental to the progression of society and any type of compassionate advancement. Revisionism was exceptionally present during the Victorian Era and led to the oppression of people outside the hetero-centric patriarch. This can be observed in the work of Victorian authors such as Charlotte and Emily Bronte as well as Robert Louis Stevenson; whom have all written in response to this period of revisionist oppression.

            Revisionism continued to be a main theme through Victorian times and repapered during the Cold War. From 1941-45 Joseph Stalin used wartime propaganda to glorify soviet ideology and create an era of “epic revisionism.” (Platt,18) Stalin’s demonstration of revisionism is the paragon of the detrimental affects of revisionism to equality and progression. This practice was able to alter the minds of the Russian people and coerce them into following the soviet ideology. The act of revising led to a period of horrendous suffering for the people under the socialist reign of the U.S.S.R. Until 1991 when the Cold War ended under President George H.W. Bush’s administration.

            Unfortunately revisionism would not take a long reprieve. During 1995 under the administration of President Bill Clinton the act of revisionism would be responsible for “The US– Japan Framework negotiations of 1993– 5 representing perhaps the nastiest and most confrontational of bilateral trade disputes ever.”( Uriu,31)  This period of tension would inspire a racially charged type of revisionism. Americans sought out to portray the Japanese as sub-humans who threatened the global influence of the United States. This revised attitude created an intense level of racial indifference. A critical moment that epitomizes this racially motivated maliciousness was the Okinawa Rape of 1995. In which two U.S. Navy servicemen rented a van, kidnaped and raped a twelve-year-old Japanese girl. This incident was instigated by the revisionist attitude that dehumanized the Japanese people. Thus providing a clear example of how dangerous the act of revisionism is in relation to progression of a compassionate society.

Despite the overwhelming evidence against the attitude of revisionism it is still a critical aspect of political conflict in contemporary society. The most recent example takes place in Florida. Florida’s political climate in recent years has reflected a revisionist attitude that is causing self inflicted damage to the political system.  This damage to the political system creates disillusion and impedes progress. People and politicians alike are revising their own attitudes to accommodate the attitudes of America’s two party political systems. People such as former state governor Charlie Crist.

Crist was a republican candidate in 2007 when he became the 44^th governor of Florida. However seven years later Crist is running for the position of governor as a Democratic candidate. Crist’s political switch is the result of revisionism. Crist started out in 2007 lobbying for conservative Florida legislation. One particular area of interest was the movement for same sex marriage in Florida. In an interview with the Miami Herald in 2014 Crist says he does not believe the government should deny individuals the right to marry but does not personally condone same sex marriage. However in 2012 Crist was under investigation for witness tampering.  The report states that Crist may have been a homosexual and attempted to be intimate with businessman Jim Greer; but you know what? It does not matter. Who gives a fuck if he tried to kiss a guy? I know I don’t. I care about how someone like Charlie Crist got 47.1% of Florida’s people to vote for him in the 2014 Florida election for Governor. Floridians should be ashamed for glorifying a man who would rather be a revisionist than admit to kissing a guy.

Works Cited

Charlie Crist's Interview with the Miami Herald Editorial Board (Part One). Charlie Crist's Interview with the Miami Herald Editorial Board (Part One). Miami Herald, n.d. Web.

El-11-0027. Panama City, Florida. 29 May 2012. N.p., n.d. Web. <http://archive.wtsp.com/assetpool/documents/120608071046_FDLE%20Greer-Crist%20report%20warning%20graphic%20language.pdf>.

Platt, Kevin M. F., and David Brandenberger. Epic Revisionism: Russian History and Literature as Stalinist Propaganda. Madison: U of Wisconsin, 2006. Print.

Uriu, Robert M. Clinton and Japan: The Impact of Revisionism on U.S. Trade Policy. New York, NY: Oxford UP, 2009. Web.

                                                          Work Referenced

Roman, Mervyn. Living in the Past: Some Revisionist Thoughts on the Historiography of Art and Design Education. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Proquest. Web.

Is it really worth it?

The medium is the massage, but is the massage worth the time? Is it worth the thirty minuets to get the mental rub down from an episode of Family Guy or read an Aristotle translation? How we are using media in context of  society is  complicated.  Because it is easy to think about “media” as a type of entity that has omnipresence in society. However the media is completely empowered by the viewer, and therefore has no means of substantial control over the viewer unless the viewer actively engages the content.

            There is a particularly interesting power shift from the mediator to the medium in the contemporary mediascape; and how the power is distributed creates an ethical question. A primary example being the relationship to the medium of the Beatles’s song “Helter Skelter” and Marylin Manson; because the medium has no influence until empowered by the mediator.  Manson used the medium as a means of validating his own nefariousness. In this situation the medium wielded less influence in the mediascape until Manson (the mediator) gave it a purpose. 
            So if the medium was empowered by nefariousness then is it ethical to profit off of it's gain? This is a question I have struggled in within my own work. 

           In these two images I have struggled with the decision to exhibit them. My motivation was to create a record of my life that no one could revise. I wanted to share these intimate moments I had with the world. The first image is of a man I met on Sixth street by the graveyard. The second image is of my close friend Lilly. But if I choose to publish these images as works of art would I be profiting on the nefariousness of my mediascape. Would it be ethical to profit from these works? Am I extorting these people for my own gain; to validate my own narcissism? Is my massage worth the time? 

             

             

Mira Nair's Sympathy Films

In my artistic practice I am particularly inspired by how aspects of social and cultural ideology affects the viewers. I believe the way the viewer is shaped by these factors is important in creating a piece of sympathetic artwork. Because the most powerful type of artwork is work  that is able to inspire sympathy in viewers and allow for the exchange of social and cultural information. It is in this type of exchange that a sense of unity in the community of humanity is established and maintained.  

            A sense of community is important in exorcising intolerance. This is not only important in traditional artwork such as painting, sculpting, or printmaking but is even more influential in popular-media mediums such as film. Films are relatively easy to obtain and do not require a lot of previous knowledge to watch. This makes them a powerful medium in contemporary society to relay sympathetic information.  

            I was fascinated by this inspirational sympathetic energy in relation to the films directed by Mira Nair.  Mira Nair’s films embody a substantial amount of diversity because they encompass the two largest cultural disparities: gender and race. I observed this trend in her films by noting the focus on feminism and Indian culture.  Nair puts a significant amount of emphasis around these two social and cultural factors. Giving Nair’s film a major sense of sympathetic energy.

            With an all female set of protagonist and emphasis on the fleeting fragility of a man’s love; a film such as “Hysterical Blindness” is an example of Nair’s film that focuses on the plight of woman and their empowerment. Similar to “Hysterical Blindness” is the short film “How Can It Be” featured in the motion picture “8.” The short film focuses attentions on the struggle of Indian woman. Nair portrays woman at a critical point in her life in which she must make a seemingly selfish decision. The Indian woman divorces her husband and leaves her son behind to be with the man she loves. The emotional friction created when woman leaves her husband and must explain to her son why she is leaving creates an emotional backlash that allows viewers a unique opportunity to be apart of the plight of a woman.

            The opportunity to experience the struggle of a woman is essential in facing misogyny in a community. Nair’s films provide a circumstance that favors woman to understand their complicated relationships regarding intimacy and infatuation. The ideas of intimacy and infatuation usually relating to the relationship of a male and female that ultimately has the capability to inspire insight within the audience.

            It is from this capability to produce insight that Nair’s films draw their authority. Nair is an Indian woman providing insight to others about woman and sometimes focusing specifically on woman in Indian culture. Allowing the viewer to be apart of a unique social and cultural niche that faces oppression in many places. Nair’s work allows viewers to acknowledge these issues woman are facing, and acknowledging the problem is the first step to changing it.

Much Ado About Nothing a Postmodern Production

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZVtLnRUSUc&feature=youtu.be

What Will Become of the Books?

In the heart of most readers and writers there is a glimmer of hope that paper books are not facing extinction. However the cold reality is that paper books are soon to be replaced.   I came to this stunning realization when I read Karen Russell’s novella “Sleep Donation.” Russell’s work was published only as an eBook and is the foreshadowing of major change in the literary world. The demand for instant gratification in a fast paced world has created an audience that no longer desires the traditional reading experience. 

            Since the turn of the twentieth century human innovations have gravitated toward a need for speed. Making faster cars, faster Internet, and even faster food are all examples of human need for instantaneous satisfaction. The same goes for reading; people are and will be seeking out a way to hasten their reading experience as well. This is why the eBook has become such a trending commodity. It can carry many books in one, and the speed of obtaining a new book is instantaneous. This instantaneous satisfaction is what is driving people to purchase eBooks and their respective reading material.

            This change in the consumerist landscape is beginning to affect the way books are written and published. Authors cannot best the eBooks, so they may as well join them. This is seemingly the case with author Karen Russell, and her novella “Sleep Donation.” It’s publication only as an eBook is an accommodation to readers of the twenty first century generation.

            By publishing her book as an eBook Karen has lost a great portion of consumer demographic, those incapable of using eBooks i.e. the elderly, but gained the acknowledgment of those able to use the required technology. And by adhering to the demands of the contemporary generation Russell is able to launch her work off an entirely new platform than traditional novelist.

            Whether this new platform will remain thriving and bring Russell successes is not for certain. Although as readers and writers we can be sure that there is change afoot in the literary world and there is no stopping it.